PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROST vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROST vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROST achieves a 27.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ROST has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 16.62%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.


ROST

1D
-3.34%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
27.67%
6M
27.34%
1Y
80.75%
3Y*
29.52%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
16.62%

SPMO

1D
-4.53%
1M
6.65%
YTD
29.91%
6M
28.13%
1Y
43.55%
3Y*
42.47%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROST vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROST
Ross Stores, Inc.
27.67%20.41%10.39%20.64%2.94%-6.03%5.81%41.72%4.78%23.53%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.91%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ROST and SPMO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.40

The correlation between ROST and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROST vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROST
ROST Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ROST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROST Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ROST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROST vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROSTSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.39

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.42

3.45

+6.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.71

12.97

+25.74

ROST vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROST Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROST and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROST vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROST drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROST and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSTSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.23%

-30.95%

-51.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-12.70%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-20.13%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.13%

-22.74%

-21.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-30.95%

-20.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-4.53%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-4.59%

-13.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.37%

-1.28%

Volatility

ROST vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 11.68% and 11.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSTSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

11.75%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.96%

17.78%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

20.55%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.57%

19.88%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.66%

20.60%

+11.06%

Dividends

ROST vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROST
Ross Stores, Inc.
0.74%0.90%0.97%0.97%1.07%1.00%0.23%1.10%1.08%0.80%0.82%4.59%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.68%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROST and SPMO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to ROST (11.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROST dropped -82.23% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

ROST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROST and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer