ROST vs. META
ROST (Ross Stores, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. ROST operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, ROST returned 17.29%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for META. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROST vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROST achieves a 33.85% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROST having a 17.29% annualized return and META not far ahead at 17.39%.
ROST
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 33.85%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 83.78%
- 3Y*
- 32.49%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
ROST vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 33.85% | 20.41% | 10.39% | 20.64% | 2.94% | -6.03% | 5.81% | 41.72% | 4.78% | 23.53% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROST and META is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ROST and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROST:
$77.14B
META:
$1.45T
ROST:
$7.15
META:
$27.47
ROST:
33.57
META:
20.64
ROST:
3.80
META:
0.85
ROST:
3.27
META:
6.78
ROST:
11.69
META:
5.97
ROST:
$23.78B
META:
$214.96B
ROST:
$4.95B
META:
$176.14B
ROST:
$3.62B
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROST vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
ROST
META
ROST vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROST | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 0.93 | +0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.52 | -0.54 | +11.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.37 | -1.12 | +39.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROST vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROST drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROST and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROST | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.23% | -76.74% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -33.30% | +25.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.08% | -34.15% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.13% | -76.74% | +32.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.41% | -76.74% | +25.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.06% | +28.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.93% | -15.83% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 16.06% | -13.81% |
Volatility
ROST vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.17%. This indicates that ROST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROST | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 10.17% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.51% | 26.91% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 35.52% | -10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 44.04% | -14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 38.67% | -7.05% |
Dividends
ROST vs. META - Dividend Comparison
ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than META's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 1.10% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 4.59% |
Financials
ROST vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ross Stores, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROST vs. META - Profitability Comparison
ROST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
ROST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 804.03M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
ROST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 649.96M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROST and META have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROST has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROST dropped -82.23% vs META's -76.74%.
ROST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROST and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer