ROSC vs. TRPA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while TRPA is a CLO fund actively managed by Hartford. ROSC is passively managed, while TRPA is actively managed. Over the past year, ROSC returned 33.38% vs 5.38% for TRPA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for TRPA.

Performance

ROSC vs. TRPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than TRPA's 1.94% return.

ROSC

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 14.46%
• 1Y: 33.38%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: 8.39%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

TRPA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. TRPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	13.44%	26.22%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	1.94%	4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and TRPA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

ROSC vs. TRPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 71
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 86
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. TRPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROSC	TRPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.31	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.75	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.47	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	8.84	-4.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	35.93	-21.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROSC vs. TRPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the TRPA Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and TRPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROSC	TRPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.31	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	2.56	-2.09

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. TRPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than TRPA's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and TRPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROSC	TRPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.13%	-0.61%	-42.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-0.61%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.01%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-0.10%	-7.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	0.15%	+2.24%

Volatility

ROSC vs. TRPA - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) at 0.28%. This indicates that ROSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROSC	TRPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	0.28%	+3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	1.57%	+8.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	2.34%	+13.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	2.37%	+16.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	2.37%	+17.91%

ROSC vs. TRPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than TRPA's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROSC vs. TRPA - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than TRPA's 5.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.84%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.19%	4.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROSC and TRPA in my portfolio?

ROSC and TRPA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROSC or TRPA?

ROSC has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to TRPA (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs TRPA's -0.61%.

Which ETF is better, ROSC or TRPA?

On 1-year performance, ROSC leads with 33.38% vs 5.38% for TRPA. On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, TRPA has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROSC or TRPA?

Over the 1-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROSC or TRPA?

TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROSC or TRPA?

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 1.84% for ROSC.

What is the main difference between ROSC and TRPA?

ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TRPA is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.24% for TRPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.