TRPA vs. RAAA
TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TRPA returned 4.85% vs 5.48% for RAAA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRPA charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.
Performance
TRPA vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRPA achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than RAAA's 2.90% return.
TRPA
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAAA
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRPA vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 2.29% | 2.64% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 2.90% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRPA and RAAA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRPA vs. RAAA — Risk / Return Rank
TRPA
RAAA
TRPA vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRPA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 2.14 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 7.76 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.62 | 43.34 | -8.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRPA vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum RAAA drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and RAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRPA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -0.71% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.61% | -0.71% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.06% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.14% | 0.13% | +0.01% |
Volatility
TRPA vs. RAAA - Volatility Comparison
Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) at 0.14%. This indicates that TRPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRPA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 0.14% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.41% | 0.99% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15% | 1.33% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 1.33% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 1.33% | +0.95% |
TRPA vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRPA vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison
TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, which matches RAAA's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 5.21% | 2.70% |
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 5.16% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRPA and RAAA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRPA has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to RAAA (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRPA dropped -0.61% vs RAAA's -0.71%.
On 1-year performance, RAAA leads with 5.48% vs 4.85% for TRPA. On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, RAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RAAA has performed better with a 5.48% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.
RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 5.16% for TRPA.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.30% for RAAA.
RAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRPA and RAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer