PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. ISMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. ISMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly lower than ISMD's 27.66% return.


ROSC

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.15%
6M
14.78%
YTD
19.82%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

ISMD

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.59%
6M
18.90%
YTD
27.66%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.42M$2.34M$1.91M
$129.89K$138.46K$121.53K

ROSC vs. ISMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
19.82%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%17.97%
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
27.66%4.14%9.53%16.74%-13.44%29.38%7.45%24.62%-12.63%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and ISMD is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017

0.89

The correlation between ROSC and ISMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROSC vs. ISMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
ISMD

Financial Services

19.3%
17.1%

Healthcare

19.0%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
10.9%

Technology

12.3%
14.1%

Industrials

11.5%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.3%

Real Estate

5.7%
8.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
1.5%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.8%

Energy

2.3%
4.5%

Utilities

1.8%
3.6%

Financial Services

ROSC
19.3%
ISMD
17.1%

Healthcare

ROSC
19.0%
ISMD
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.8%
ISMD
10.9%

Technology

ROSC
12.3%
ISMD
14.1%

Industrials

ROSC
11.5%
ISMD
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.3%
ISMD
6.3%

Real Estate

ROSC
5.7%
ISMD
8.5%

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
ISMD
1.5%

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.7%
ISMD
6.8%

Energy

ROSC
2.3%
ISMD
4.5%

Utilities

ROSC
1.8%
ISMD
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. ISMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ISMD
ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROSC vs. ISMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROSCISMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

4.03

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

13.05

+2.85

ROSC vs. ISMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the ISMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and ISMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. ISMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ISMD drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and ISMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCISMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-44.60%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-9.64%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-26.64%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-26.64%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.21%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-8.05%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.97%

-0.67%

Volatility

ROSC vs. ISMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is 3.31%, while Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that ROSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCISMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.68%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

12.55%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

18.22%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

20.76%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

23.62%

-3.38%

ROSC vs. ISMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ISMD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. ISMD - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than ISMD's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
1.12%1.21%1.24%1.17%1.28%9.35%0.99%0.88%1.35%2.02%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.80%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and ISMD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISMD has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to ROSC (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs ISMD's -44.60%.

On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 9.77% vs 9.57% for ISMD. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.12% for ISMD.

ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.57% for ISMD.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and ISMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer