ROSC vs. HSRT
ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while HSRT is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HSRT.
Performance
ROSC vs. HSRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC vs. HSRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.71% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -14.33% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 6.44% | 7.52% | -4.40% | 0.58% | 3.77% | 6.95% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROSC and HSRT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROSC vs. HSRT — Risk / Return Rank
ROSC
HSRT
ROSC vs. HSRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROSC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROSC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ROSC vs. HSRT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROSC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | — | — |
Volatility
ROSC vs. HSRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROSC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | — | — |
ROSC vs. HSRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than HSRT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROSC vs. HSRT - Dividend Comparison
ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.87% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROSC and HSRT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HSRT is CLO. ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while HSRT tracks JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.24% for HSRT.
Find the right allocation for ROSC and HSRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer