ROSC vs. GSC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and GSC (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ROSC is passively managed, while GSC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROSC returned 11.36%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for GSC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSC.

Performance

ROSC vs. GSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly lower than GSC's 21.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROSC having a 11.36% annualized return and GSC not far ahead at 11.56%.

ROSC

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

GSC

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 7.98%
• YTD: 21.55%
• 6M: 18.78%
• 1Y: 33.32%
• 3Y*: 28.34%
• 5Y*: 24.30%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. GSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	16.64%	10.18%	7.28%	18.88%	-10.58%	31.37%	5.27%	17.09%	-12.38%	24.49%
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF	21.55%	6.29%	13.79%	33.52%	28.40%	58.09%	-33.08%	29.69%	-19.52%	2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and GSC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015	0.27

Over the past year, ROSC and GSC have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ROSC vs. GSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROSC	GSC
Healthcare	20.0%	13.6%
Financial Services	18.4%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	10.4%
Technology	13.0%	22.7%
Industrials	11.0%	19.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	5.6%	2.6%
Communication Services	3.5%	0.9%
Energy	3.2%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.6%	5.2%
Utilities	1.9%	3.0%

Return for Risk

ROSC vs. GSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 79
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

GSC

GSC Risk / Return Rank: 46
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. GSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROSC	GSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	0.08	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.83	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.99	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	0.57	+3.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.75	1.98	+12.78

ROSC vs. GSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the GSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and GSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. GSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum GSC drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and GSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROSC	GSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.13%	-88.63%	+45.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-58.25%	+50.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.74%	-58.25%	+34.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.74%	-58.25%	+34.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	-66.06%	+22.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-27.81%	+27.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-59.18%	+52.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	16.91%	-14.54%

Volatility

ROSC vs. GSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is 3.54%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that ROSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROSC	GSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	6.31%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	187.41%	-177.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	403.80%	-388.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.29%	218.85%	-199.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	160.44%	-140.20%

ROSC vs. GSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GSC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROSC vs. GSC - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than GSC's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF	0.16%	0.16%	0.66%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.79%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROSC and GSC in my portfolio?

ROSC and GSC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROSC or GSC?

GSC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs GSC's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, ROSC or GSC?

On 10-year performance, GSC leads with 11.56% vs 11.36% for ROSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROSC or GSC?

Over the 10-year period, GSC has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROSC or GSC?

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROSC or GSC?

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.16% for GSC.

What is the main difference between ROSC and GSC?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.75% for GSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.