ROSC vs. CVSM
ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ROSC is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
ROSC vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 14.78%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.73%
CVSM
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.53K | $49.87K | $42.10K | |
| $129.89K | $138.46K | $121.53K |
ROSC vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 9.29% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROSC and CVSM is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROSC vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
ROSC
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROSC vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROSC | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROSC vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROSC | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.13% | -3.36% | -39.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -2.33% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -0.96% | -6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility
ROSC vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROSC | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 11.65% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 11.65% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 11.65% | +8.59% |
ROSC vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROSC vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.80% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROSC and CVSM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for ROSC and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer