ROSC vs. ASCE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ROSC is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Over the past year, ROSC returned 33.38% vs 36.63% for ASCE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

ROSC vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 25.79% return.

ROSC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.93%
• 6M: 14.42%
• YTD: 19.29%
• 1Y: 33.38%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

ASCE

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: 19.63%
• YTD: 25.79%
• 1Y: 36.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	19.29%	11.86%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	25.79%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and ASCE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.78

The correlation between ROSC and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ROSC vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 87
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 77
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROSC	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.87	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	2.71	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.31	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	3.99	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.20	12.48	+1.72

ROSC vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROSC	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.13%	-9.22%	-33.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-9.22%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-4.17%	+3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-2.03%	-5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	2.94%	-0.58%

Volatility

ROSC vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is 3.49%, while Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that ROSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROSC	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	7.16%	-3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	14.91%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	19.75%	-4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	19.65%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	19.65%	+0.59%

ROSC vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROSC vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.81%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROSC and ASCE in my portfolio?

ROSC and ASCE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROSC or ASCE?

ASCE has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to ROSC (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, ROSC or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 36.63% vs 33.38% for ROSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROSC or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 36.63% return vs 33.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROSC or ASCE?

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROSC or ASCE?

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ROSC and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.