ROP vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, ROP returned 7.33%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ROP vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -25.12% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 7.33%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.

ROP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -6.94%
• YTD: -25.12%
• 6M: -25.06%
• 1Y: -41.13%
• 3Y*: -9.41%
• 5Y*: -5.38%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

PSLV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 6M: 23.11%
• 1Y: 102.24%
• 3Y*: 42.33%
• 5Y*: 18.65%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROP vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc.	-25.12%	-13.85%	-4.11%	26.92%	-11.64%	14.69%	22.39%	33.66%	3.51%	42.39%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-0.89%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ROP and PSLV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.09

The correlation between ROP and PSLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ROP : $34.71B PSLV : $14.73B
EPS ROP : $15.98 PSLV : $13.57
PE Ratio ROP : 20.77 PSLV : 1.71
PEG Ratio ROP : 2.46 PSLV : 0.00
PS Ratio ROP : 4.39 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio ROP : 1.84 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ROP : $8.12B PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) ROP : $5.63B PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) ROP : $3.24B PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

ROP vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROP

ROP Risk / Return Rank: 3
ROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
ROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ROP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 47
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROP vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROP	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.65	1.76	-3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.39	1.99	-4.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.33	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	2.53	-3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	5.58	-7.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROP vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROP Sharpe Ratio is -1.65, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROP and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROP	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.65	1.76	-3.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.53	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.45	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.17	+0.32

Drawdowns

ROP vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROP	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.94%	-79.38%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.66%	-40.65%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.51%	-40.65%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.51%	-40.65%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.51%	-42.79%	-3.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.61%	-35.53%	-8.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-58.15%	+46.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.50%	18.38%	+8.12%

Volatility

ROP vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is 10.15%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that ROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROP	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	16.60%	-6.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.61%	57.34%	-35.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.06%	58.49%	-33.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	35.64%	-14.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.35%	31.14%	-7.79%

Dividends

ROP vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

ROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc.	1.05%	0.74%	0.58%	0.50%	0.57%	0.46%	0.48%	0.52%	0.62%	0.54%	0.66%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROP and PSLV in my portfolio?

ROP and PSLV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROP or PSLV?

PSLV has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to ROP (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROP dropped -58.94% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.