RONB vs. AVUS
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RONB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
RONB vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 13.23% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
RONB vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -6.63% | -0.76% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 13.23% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and AVUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVUS
RONB vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RONB | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RONB vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -37.04% | +23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -1.93% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -5.06% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 12.73% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 17.36% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 20.83% | -0.40% |
RONB vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and AVUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
RONB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.15% for AVUS.
Find the right allocation for RONB and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer