PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROMA vs. BLZE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROMA vs. BLZE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMA achieves a 424.26% return, which is significantly higher than BLZE's 247.42% return.


ROMA

1D
4.60%
1M
14.10%
6M
484.93%
YTD
424.26%
1Y
156.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLZE

1D
-8.01%
1M
104.42%
6M
214.37%
YTD
247.42%
1Y
213.76%
3Y*
44.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROMA vs. BLZE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
424.26%116.67%-92.20%
BLZE
Backblaze, Inc.
247.42%-22.59%-15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ROMA and BLZE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2024

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROMA:

$527.74M

BLZE:

$971.64M

EPS

ROMA:

-$0.78

BLZE:

-$0.39

PS Ratio

ROMA:

22.19

BLZE:

6.21

PB Ratio

ROMA:

35.67

BLZE:

11.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROMA:

$17.51M

BLZE:

$149.89M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROMA:

$6.13M

BLZE:

$93.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

ROMA:

-$35.11M

BLZE:

-$899.00K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROMA vs. BLZE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMA
ROMA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ROMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ROMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BLZE
BLZE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BLZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLZE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BLZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLZE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMA vs. BLZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROMABLZEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.11

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

5.00

-0.78

ROMA vs. BLZE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the BLZE Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMA and BLZE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROMA vs. BLZE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMA drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, which is greater than BLZE's maximum drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMA and BLZE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMABLZEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.15%

-89.49%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.12%

-69.21%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.31%

-48.60%

+34.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.61%

-77.17%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.24%

42.95%

-5.71%

Volatility

ROMA vs. BLZE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) is 24.31%, while Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) has a volatility of 39.65%. This indicates that ROMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMABLZEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.31%

39.65%

-15.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

148.64%

74.21%

+74.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

174.24%

104.15%

+70.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

160.81%

84.76%

+76.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.81%

84.76%

+76.05%

Dividends

ROMA vs. BLZE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROMA nor BLZE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ROMA vs. BLZE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares and Backblaze, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
477.27K
38.67M
(ROMA) Total Revenue
(BLZE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ROMA and BLZE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLZE has higher volatility (39.65%) compared to ROMA (24.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMA dropped -95.15% vs BLZE's -89.49%.

BLZE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROMA and BLZE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer