ROMA vs. TQQQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).

TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010.

Performance

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ROMA Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares	137.28%	116.67%	-73.10%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	-20.81%	34.35%	63.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMA achieves a 137.28% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return.

ROMA

• 1D: -7.39%
• 1M: 52.47%
• YTD: 137.28%
• 6M: 37.80%
• 1Y: 410.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TQQQ

• 1D: 10.00%
• 1M: -15.69%
• YTD: -20.81%
• 6M: -19.12%
• 1Y: 46.49%
• 3Y*: 45.09%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 34.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROMA vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMA

ROMA Risk / Return Rank: 93
ROMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ROMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ROMA Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ROMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ROMA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 50
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROMA	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	0.69	+1.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	1.37	+1.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.19	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.19	1.25	+4.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.98	3.87	+9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMA and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROMA	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	0.69	+1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.64	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between ROMA and TQQQ is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ROMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROMA Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.76%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMA drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMA and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROMA	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	-81.66%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.12%	-36.97%	-32.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.22%	-30.66%	-30.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.98%	-18.66%	-42.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.96%	12.00%	+20.96%

Volatility

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) has a higher volatility of 89.93% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 19.43%. This indicates that ROMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROMA	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	89.93%	19.43%	+70.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	146.36%	38.32%	+108.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	175.70%	67.26%	+108.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	160.30%	66.55%	+93.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	160.30%	65.83%	+94.47%