PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROMA vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMA achieves a 331.95% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


ROMA

1D
-4.20%
1M
3.40%
YTD
331.95%
6M
191.94%
1Y
114.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
331.95%116.67%-73.10%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%63.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ROMA and TQQQ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2024

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROMA vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMA
ROMA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ROMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMATQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.75

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

12.27

-9.17

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMA and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMATQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.92

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.74

-0.44

Drawdowns

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMA drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMA and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMATQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-81.66%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.12%

-36.97%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.40%

-0.76%

-28.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

-18.52%

-40.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.89%

11.28%

+25.61%

Volatility

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) has a higher volatility of 25.40% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that ROMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMATQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.40%

13.29%

+12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

149.30%

36.04%

+113.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

175.79%

47.60%

+128.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

156.77%

66.53%

+90.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

156.77%

65.96%

+90.81%

Dividends

ROMA vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ROMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROMA and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROMA has higher volatility (25.40%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMA dropped -88.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROMA and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer