PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLZE vs. GH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLZE vs. GH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) and Guardant Health, Inc. (GH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLZE achieves a 70.60% return, which is significantly higher than GH's 24.37% return.


BLZE

1D
-10.67%
1M
71.34%
YTD
70.60%
6M
68.08%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10Y*

GH

1D
-2.41%
1M
39.33%
YTD
24.37%
6M
19.88%
1Y
177.42%
3Y*
57.70%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLZE vs. GH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BLZE
Backblaze, Inc.
70.60%-22.59%-20.69%23.41%-63.59%-15.13%
GH
Guardant Health, Inc.
24.37%234.34%12.94%-0.55%-72.81%-5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BLZE and GH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021

0.31

The correlation between BLZE and GH shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLZE:

$471.36M

GH:

$16.68B

EPS

BLZE:

-$0.39

GH:

-$3.40

PS Ratio

BLZE:

3.02

GH:

14.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLZE:

$149.89M

GH:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLZE:

$93.07M

GH:

$701.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLZE:

-$899.00K

GH:

-$411.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLZE vs. GH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLZE
BLZE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BLZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLZE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BLZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLZE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GH
GH Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLZE vs. GH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) and Guardant Health, Inc. (GH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLZEGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.49

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

5.41

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

13.44

-12.63

BLZE vs. GH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLZE Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the GH Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLZE and GH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLZEGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

3.09

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.29

-0.51

Drawdowns

BLZE vs. GH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLZE drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, roughly equal to the maximum GH drawdown of -91.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLZE and GH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLZEGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.49%

-91.03%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.21%

-32.98%

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.02%

-59.79%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.76%

-29.07%

-45.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-51.68%

-25.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.76%

13.26%

+29.50%

Volatility

BLZE vs. GH - Volatility Comparison

Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) has a higher volatility of 53.14% compared to Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) at 18.85%. This indicates that BLZE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLZEGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.14%

18.85%

+34.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.90%

37.92%

+23.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.49%

58.38%

+34.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.46%

67.65%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.46%

68.13%

+14.33%

Dividends

BLZE vs. GH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLZE nor GH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BLZE vs. GH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Backblaze, Inc. and Guardant Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
38.67M
301.67M
(BLZE) Total Revenue
(GH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLZE vs. GH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Backblaze, Inc. and Guardant Health, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
60.9%
65.2%
Portfolio components
BLZE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Backblaze, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.53M and revenue of 38.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

GH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.75M and revenue of 301.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.

BLZE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Backblaze, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.35M and revenue of 38.67M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.8%.

GH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported an operating income of -121.35M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.2%.

BLZE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Backblaze, Inc. reported a net income of -6.15M and revenue of 38.67M, resulting in a net margin of -15.9%.

GH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a net income of -112.08M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in a net margin of -37.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLZE and GH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLZE has higher volatility (53.14%) compared to GH (18.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLZE dropped -89.49% vs GH's -91.03%.

GH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLZE and GH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer