ROL vs. NVDA
ROL (Rollins, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. ROL operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ROL returned 15.58%/yr vs 67.95%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 15.58%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.
ROL
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -20.87%
- 6M
- -20.91%
- 1Y
- -16.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
ROL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -20.87% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROL and NVDA is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.28 |
The correlation between ROL and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROL:
$22.72B
NVDA:
$5.00T
ROL:
$1.10
NVDA:
$6.53
ROL:
43.09
NVDA:
31.44
ROL:
3.90
NVDA:
0.17
ROL:
5.93
NVDA:
19.80
ROL:
16.44
NVDA:
25.60
ROL:
$3.84B
NVDA:
$253.49B
ROL:
$1.53B
NVDA:
$187.95B
ROL:
$859.94M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ROL
NVDA
ROL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.21 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.07 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 4.94 | -6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -89.72% | +32.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.90% | -20.21% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -36.88% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.90% | -66.34% | +35.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.90% | -66.34% | +35.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.60% | -12.86% | -14.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -36.18% | +24.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.53% | 8.46% | +2.07% |
Volatility
ROL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) is 9.24%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that ROL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 13.26% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 26.67% | -8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.16% | 35.00% | -10.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 51.76% | -27.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 49.84% | -24.80% |
Dividends
ROL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
Financials
ROL vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rollins, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
ROL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
ROL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
ROL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROL and NVDA have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to ROL (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROL and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer