ROKT vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. ROKT is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, ROKT returned 67.32% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

ROKT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.13% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -8.09%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 29.72%
• 1Y: 67.32%
• 3Y*: 36.99%
• 5Y*: 22.41%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	29.72%	55.12%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and WNTR is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.44

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 80
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROKT	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.26	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.47	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	2.84	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.94	7.31	+4.64

ROKT vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-42.65%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-42.65%	+23.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.30%	-10.15%	-9.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-20.53%	+13.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	16.58%	-10.93%

Volatility

ROKT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is 10.83%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that ROKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.83%	18.84%	-8.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.34%	47.46%	-21.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.74%	53.83%	-22.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.47%	53.56%	-30.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	53.56%	-28.13%

ROKT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROKT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and WNTR in my portfolio?

ROKT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROKT or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to ROKT (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, ROKT or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 67.32% for ROKT. On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ROKT has been the lower-risk option at 10.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROKT or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 67.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROKT or WNTR?

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROKT or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.28% for ROKT.

What is the main difference between ROKT and WNTR?

ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.