ROKT vs. SPY
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROKT returned 24.68%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ROKT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.
ROKT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 60.20%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
ROKT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 46.55% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROKT and SPY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ROKT and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ROKT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROKT
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ROKT
SPY
Technology
ROKT
SPY
Energy
ROKT
SPY
Communication Services
ROKT
SPY
Basic Materials
ROKT
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ROKT
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ROKT
-
SPY
Financial Services
ROKT
-
SPY
Healthcare
ROKT
-
SPY
Real Estate
ROKT
-
SPY
Utilities
ROKT
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROKT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ROKT
SPY
ROKT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROKT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.82 | 3.16 | +6.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.81 | 14.72 | +21.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROKT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88 | 2.38 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.82 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
ROKT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROKT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -55.19% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -8.88% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.46% | -18.76% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | -24.50% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -0.70% | -8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -9.05% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.91% | +1.21% |
Volatility
ROKT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROKT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 2.84% | +10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.98% | 8.90% | +16.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.89% | 11.83% | +17.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 17.05% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.14% | 17.94% | +7.20% |
ROKT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROKT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROKT and SPY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 13.83% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 13.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.
ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.09% for SPY.
ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROKT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer