ROKT vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. ROKT is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

ROKT vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 41.13% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 41.13%
• 6M: 44.16%
• 1Y: 96.95%
• 3Y*: 41.87%
• 5Y*: 23.65%
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	41.13%	22.80%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and LRCU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 92
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROKT	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.23	—	—

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-40.09%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.20%	0.00%	-12.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-9.34%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.97%	113.97%	-83.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.32%	113.97%	-90.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.42%	113.97%	-88.55%

ROKT vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROKT vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and LRCU in my portfolio?

ROKT and LRCU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROKT or LRCU?

On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROKT or LRCU?

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROKT or LRCU?

ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between ROKT and LRCU?

ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 1.30% for LRCU.