PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROK vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROK vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROK achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 229.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ROK has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 16.90%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 40.68% annualized return.


ROK

1D
0.38%
1M
1.27%
YTD
18.84%
6M
14.11%
1Y
43.27%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
16.90%

MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
57.18%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROK vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
18.84%38.36%-6.23%22.63%-24.78%41.21%26.17%37.85%-21.79%48.87%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ROK and MRVL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROK:

$51.72B

MRVL:

$249.86B

EPS

ROK:

$9.63

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

ROK:

47.68

MRVL:

96.58

PS Ratio

ROK:

5.89

MRVL:

27.99

PB Ratio

ROK:

14.69

MRVL:

13.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROK:

$8.80B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROK:

$4.63B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROK:

$1.56B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROK vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROK
ROK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ROK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ROK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROK Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROK vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROKMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.55

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

11.57

-9.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

26.42

-19.08

ROK vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROK Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROK and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROK vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROK drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROK and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-91.60%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.73%

-26.36%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.84%

-60.79%

+25.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.09%

-61.88%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.09%

-61.88%

+16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-11.61%

+10.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-46.74%

+31.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

11.52%

-5.60%

Volatility

ROK vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) is 10.07%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 40.61%. This indicates that ROK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

40.61%

-30.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

55.42%

-31.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

70.94%

-41.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.83%

61.82%

-29.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

51.94%

-20.45%

Dividends

ROK vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

ROK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than MRVL's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1.19%1.36%1.77%1.54%1.76%1.24%1.65%1.94%2.42%1.59%2.18%2.61%

Financials

ROK vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.24B
2.42B
(ROK) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROK vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
50.3%
52.2%
Portfolio components
ROK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

ROK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported an operating income of 467.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

ROK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a net income of 350.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROK and MRVL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to ROK (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROK dropped -75.83% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROK and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer