ROK vs. FAST
ROK (Rockwell Automation, Inc.) and FAST (Fastenal Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ROK in Specialty Industrial Machinery, FAST in Industrial Distribution. Over the past 10 years, ROK returned 17.73%/yr vs 19.47%/yr for FAST. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ROK vs. FAST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROK achieves a 24.20% return, which is significantly higher than FAST's 20.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ROK has underperformed FAST with an annualized return of 17.73%, while FAST has yielded a comparatively higher 19.47% annualized return.
ROK
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- YTD
- 24.20%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.21%
FAST
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | $378.10M | $419.64M | $355.81M |
| $332.04M | $329.97M | $373.52M |
ROK vs. FAST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 24.20% | 38.36% | -6.23% | 22.63% | -24.78% | 41.21% | 26.17% | 37.85% | -21.79% | 48.87% |
FAST Fastenal Company | 20.84% | 13.98% | 13.53% | 41.31% | -24.34% | 34.06% | 36.60% | 45.08% | -1.61% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROK and FAST is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
The correlation between ROK and FAST shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROK:
$53.42B
FAST:
$54.75B
ROK:
$9.64
FAST:
$1.18
ROK:
49.82
FAST:
40.60
ROK:
6.16
FAST:
6.27
ROK:
15.35
FAST:
13.49
ROK:
$8.80B
FAST:
$8.75B
ROK:
$4.63B
FAST:
$3.91B
ROK:
$1.56B
FAST:
$1.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROK vs. FAST — Risk / Return Rank
ROK
FAST
ROK vs. FAST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Fastenal Company (FAST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROK | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.06 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 0.26 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 0.51 | +5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROK vs. FAST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROK drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than FAST's maximum drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROK and FAST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROK | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -63.43% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.73% | -21.90% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.03% | -21.90% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.09% | -30.71% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -30.71% | -14.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -3.26% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.84% | -12.14% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 11.17% | -5.12% |
Volatility
ROK vs. FAST - Volatility Comparison
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Fastenal Company (FAST) have volatilities of 8.11% and 8.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROK | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 8.04% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | 19.42% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 25.49% | +5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 24.53% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 26.80% | +4.72% |
Dividends
ROK vs. FAST - Dividend Comparison
ROK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FAST's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.17% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% |
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1.14% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.54% | 1.76% | 1.24% | 1.65% | 1.94% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 2.18% | 2.61% |
Financials
ROK vs. FAST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Fastenal Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROK vs. FAST - Profitability Comparison
ROK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.
FAST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 2.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.
ROK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported an operating income of 467.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
FAST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 501.80M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
ROK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a net income of 350.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
FAST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 382.80M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROK and FAST have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROK has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to FAST (8.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROK dropped -75.83% vs FAST's -63.43%.
ROK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROK and FAST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer