PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROK vs. BE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROK vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROK achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 199.48% return.


ROK

1D
0.38%
1M
1.27%
YTD
18.84%
6M
14.11%
1Y
43.27%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
16.90%

BE

1D
4.56%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
199.48%
6M
173.97%
1Y
1,069.53%
3Y*
145.16%
5Y*
59.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROK vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
18.84%38.36%-6.23%22.63%-24.78%41.21%26.17%37.85%-10.78%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
199.48%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%-23.48%283.67%-25.15%-46.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ROK and BE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.33

The correlation between ROK and BE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROK:

$51.72B

BE:

$83.19B

EPS

ROK:

$9.63

BE:

$0.02

PE Ratio

ROK:

47.68

BE:

11.33K

PS Ratio

ROK:

5.89

BE:

27.91

PB Ratio

ROK:

14.69

BE:

90.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROK:

$8.80B

BE:

$2.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROK:

$4.63B

BE:

$761.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

ROK:

$1.56B

BE:

$88.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROK vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROK
ROK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ROK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ROK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROK Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROK vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROKBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.62

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

23.53

-21.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

73.01

-65.67

ROK vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROK Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 10.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROK and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROK vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROK drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROK and BE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-92.54%

+16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.73%

-45.94%

+27.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.84%

-53.42%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.09%

-75.87%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-15.48%

+14.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-51.91%

+37.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

14.78%

-8.86%

Volatility

ROK vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) is 10.07%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 27.74%. This indicates that ROK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

27.74%

-17.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

75.65%

-51.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

107.62%

-78.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.83%

85.95%

-54.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

95.68%

-64.19%

Dividends

ROK vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

ROK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while BE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1.19%1.36%1.77%1.54%1.76%1.24%1.65%1.94%2.42%1.59%2.18%2.61%

Financials

ROK vs. BE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.24B
751.05M
(ROK) Total Revenue
(BE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROK vs. BE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
50.3%
30.0%
Portfolio components
ROK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

ROK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported an operating income of 467.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

ROK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a net income of 350.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROK and BE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to ROK (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROK dropped -75.83% vs BE's -92.54%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROK and BE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer