ROE vs. QUAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL).
ROE and QUAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROE is an actively managed fund by Astoria. It was launched on Jul 31, 2023. QUAL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Jul 18, 2013.
Performance
ROE vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROE vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 0.75% | 17.20% | 18.34% | 4.29% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | -3.22% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 5.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's -3.22% return.
ROE
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROE vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROE vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
ROE
QUAL
ROE vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROE | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.77 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.22 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.23 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 5.67 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROE | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.77 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.75 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROE and QUAL is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROE vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than QUAL's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 1.13% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.98% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
ROE vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and QUAL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROE | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -34.06% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -11.52% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -6.44% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -4.15% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.50% | +0.08% |
Volatility
ROE vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 5.37%. This indicates that ROE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROE | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 5.37% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 9.30% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 17.47% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 17.34% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 18.08% | -2.17% |