RODM vs. BINV
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Brandes International ETF (BINV).
RODM and BINV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. BINV is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.
Performance
RODM vs. BINV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RODM vs. BINV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 7.69% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 10.93% |
BINV Brandes International ETF | 3.47% | 37.84% | 7.71% | 12.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than BINV's 3.47% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 32.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
BINV
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RODM vs. BINV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BINV's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. BINV — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
BINV
RODM vs. BINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Brandes International ETF (BINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RODM | BINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.67 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.35 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.50 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | 9.74 | +6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RODM | BINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.67 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.69 | -1.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and BINV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RODM vs. BINV - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than BINV's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.89% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
BINV Brandes International ETF | 2.12% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. BINV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than BINV's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and BINV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | BINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -14.91% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -11.50% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -7.08% | +3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -2.29% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.95% | -0.96% |
Volatility
RODM vs. BINV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 5.20%, while Brandes International ETF (BINV) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | BINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 6.20% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 10.08% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 17.39% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 14.68% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 14.68% | +0.53% |