ROCQ vs. QBUF
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QBUF (Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. ROCQ is actively managed, while QBUF is passively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBUF.
Performance
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROCQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QBUF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $858.18K | $1.07M | $961.40K | |
| $13.25M | $10.81M | $11.79M |
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 13.59% |
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCQ and QBUF is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROCQ vs. QBUF — Risk / Return Rank
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBUF
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROCQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum QBUF drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and QBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -8.84% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -1.99% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.82% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROCQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 6.12% | +13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 8.44% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 8.44% | +11.57% |
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QBUF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROCQ vs. QBUF - Dividend Comparison
ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROCQ and QBUF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUF.
ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.00% for QBUF.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.79% for QBUF.
Find the right allocation for ROCQ and QBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer