PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROCQ vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROCQ vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ROCQ

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.59%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PBP

1D
0.22%
1M
1.70%
6M
6.52%
YTD
7.80%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
7.27%
ALL TIME*
5.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.16M$1.09M$978.18K
$13.25M$10.81M$11.79M

ROCQ vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROCQ and PBP is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROCQ vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROCQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROCQ vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROCQPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.72

ROCQ vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROCQ vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROCQPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-43.43%

+35.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

0.00%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-6.64%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

Volatility

ROCQ vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROCQPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

7.43%

+12.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

11.85%

+8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

13.66%

+6.35%

ROCQ vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROCQ vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than PBP's 11.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.39%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%
ROCQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF
3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROCQ and PBP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ROCQ.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.39%, compared with 3.08% for ROCQ.

ROCQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PBP is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.29% for PBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROCQ and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer