PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROCQ vs. COSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROCQ vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ROCQ

1D
-0.12%
1M
6.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROCQ vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROCQ and COSW is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROCQ vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ROCQ vs. COSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROCQCOSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.49

0.01

+7.48

Drawdowns

ROCQ vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and COSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROCQCOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-16.24%

+11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-14.62%

+14.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-4.17%

+3.51%

Volatility

ROCQ vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROCQCOSWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

26.10%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

26.10%

-9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

26.10%

-9.97%

ROCQ vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROCQ vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than COSW's 18.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROCQ and COSW have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 2.02% for ROCQ.

ROCQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COSW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.99% for COSW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROCQ and COSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer