ROBT vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ROBT is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROBT returned 6.34%/yr vs 30.01%/yr for GTEK. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

ROBT vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 43.93% return.

ROBT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.99%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 6.34%
• 5Y*: 1.40%
• 10Y*: —

GTEK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 37.67%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 1Y: 61.00%
• 3Y*: 30.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	7.10%	15.16%	-0.41%	27.77%	-34.94%	-2.84%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	43.93%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and GTEK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.90

The correlation between ROBT and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBT vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBT	GTEK
Technology	58.6%	74.5%
Industrials	20.1%	8.1%
Healthcare	6.9%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	4.9%
Communication Services	3.8%	3.7%
Financial Services	1.5%	1.2%
Energy	1.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ROBT vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 20
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 82
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBT	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.06	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.61	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.34	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	5.51	-4.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.89	16.03	-14.14

ROBT vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBT	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.47%	-53.77%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.66%	-11.13%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.68%	-27.49%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.85%	-8.53%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.86%	-26.98%	+11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.97%	3.82%	+4.15%

Volatility

ROBT vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) is 6.80%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that ROBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBT	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.80%	11.82%	-5.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.41%	26.11%	-6.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.89%	29.70%	-4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.54%	28.82%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.56%	28.82%	-3.26%

ROBT vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBT vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

ROBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBT and GTEK in my portfolio?

ROBT and GTEK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBT or GTEK?

GTEK has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to ROBT (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, ROBT or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 30.01% vs 6.34% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBT or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBT or GTEK?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBT or GTEK?

ROBT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between ROBT and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.