ROBT vs. CHPS
ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ROBT returned 30.71% vs 223.67% for CHPS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
ROBT vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
ROBT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.22% | 15.16% | -0.41% | -3.76% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBT and CHPS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ROBT and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBT vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBT
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ROBT
CHPS
Industrials
ROBT
CHPS
Healthcare
ROBT
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROBT
CHPS
-
Communication Services
ROBT
CHPS
-
Financial Services
ROBT
CHPS
Energy
ROBT
CHPS
Consumer Defensive
ROBT
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
ROBT
-
CHPS
-
Real Estate
ROBT
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
ROBT
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBT vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
ROBT
CHPS
ROBT vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.81 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 12.87 | -11.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 49.99 | -45.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 6.54 | -5.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.81 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
ROBT vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.47% | -39.44% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | -17.50% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | 0.00% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -9.16% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 4.50% | +3.03% |
Volatility
ROBT vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) is 6.46%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that ROBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 14.18% | -7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.51% | 28.19% | -10.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.32% | 34.43% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 33.78% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 33.78% | -8.30% |
ROBT vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBT vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBT and CHPS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to ROBT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 30.71% for ROBT. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 30.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
ROBT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBT and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer