ROBN vs. FUTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.

Performance

ROBN vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.

ROBN

• 1D: -12.05%
• 1M: 10.71%
• YTD: -60.08%
• 6M: -72.54%
• 1Y: -29.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUTG

• 1D: -11.10%
• 1M: -70.24%
• YTD: -75.53%
• 6M: -77.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-60.08%	-39.70%
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	-75.53%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and FUTG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

ROBN vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 10
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROBN	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROBN	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	-0.66	+0.63

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and FUTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBN	FUTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.84%	-86.19%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.36%	-84.29%	+2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.20%	-40.35%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROBN	FUTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	137.84%	136.01%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	152.35%	136.01%	+16.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	152.35%	136.01%	+16.34%

ROBN vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBN vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	11.22%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBN and FUTG in my portfolio?

ROBN and FUTG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBN or FUTG?

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBN or FUTG?

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBN or FUTG?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.

What is the main difference between ROBN and FUTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.75% for FUTG.