ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ROBE.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and ETRA.L (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBE.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while ETRA.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ROBE.L returned 34.78% vs 30.26% for ETRA.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROBE.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ETRA.L.

Performance

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while ETRA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ETRA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly higher than ETRA.L's 11.81% return.

ROBE.L

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -4.91%
• 6M: 10.91%
• YTD: 18.25%
• 1Y: 34.78%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

ETRA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 3.33%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 1Y: 30.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ROBE.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	18.25%	9.14%	4.49%
ETRA.L L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc	11.81%	13.15%	-18.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and ETRA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L

ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ETRA.L

ETRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
ETRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
ETRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ETRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ETRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ETRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBE.L	ETRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	0.69	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.32	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	1.21	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	2.30	+6.17

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the ETRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBE.L and ETRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, which is greater than ETRA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and ETRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBE.L	ETRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.18%	-25.71%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	-25.11%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.89%	-8.97%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.59%	-18.03%	+6.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	13.14%	-8.89%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L) at 4.58%. This indicates that ROBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBE.L	ETRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.94%	4.58%	+5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.85%	11.73%	+8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.31%	43.78%	-19.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.35%	33.03%	-10.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.43%	33.03%	-11.60%

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ETRA.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBE.L vs. ETRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBE.L nor ETRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBE.L and ETRA.L in my portfolio?

ROBE.L and ETRA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBE.L or ETRA.L?

On fees, ETRA.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBE.L or ETRA.L?

ETRA.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

What is the main difference between ROBE.L and ETRA.L?

ROBE.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ETRA.L is Commodities. ROBE.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while ETRA.L tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.65% for ETRA.L.