PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMF.L vs. WCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COMF.L is traded in USD, while WCOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WCOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMF.L achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly lower than WCOG.L's 25.38% return. Over the past 10 years, COMF.L has outperformed WCOG.L with an annualized return of 8.22%, while WCOG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.


COMF.L

1D
0.39%
1M
1.29%
6M
10.85%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
8.22%

WCOG.L

1D
0.31%
1M
1.10%
6M
18.12%
YTD
25.38%
1Y
36.04%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMF.L
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
15.66%16.43%5.13%-6.37%18.73%32.96%2.52%7.36%-8.43%3.10%
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
25.38%16.09%2.71%-7.51%12.84%27.21%0.90%7.21%-9.13%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between COMF.L and WCOG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016

0.84

The correlation between COMF.L and WCOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMF.L
COMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
COMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
COMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WCOG.L
WCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMF.LWCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.59

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

8.86

-2.37

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMF.L and WCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMF.L drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, which is greater than WCOG.L's maximum drawdown of -44.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMF.L and WCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMF.LWCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.21%

-44.62%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-13.88%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.25%

-13.88%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-24.46%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.69%

-28.47%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-7.98%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-21.77%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

4.06%

-0.29%

Volatility

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) is 3.91%, while WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that COMF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMF.LWCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.10%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

15.88%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

17.70%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

15.76%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

13.71%

-0.43%

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMF.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMF.L vs. WCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

COMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WCOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
COMF.L
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
2.82%4.56%4.55%0.65%0.00%0.30%1.62%1.64%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


COMF.L and WCOG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOG.L.

COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while WCOG.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity. They also come from different issuers: L&G and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for COMF.L and 0.35% for WCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMF.L and WCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer