PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAM vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROAM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROAM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
6.43%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%7.31%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
8.23%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 8.23% return.


ROAM

1D
2.47%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
6.43%
6M
13.25%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
7.63%

EMXC

1D
4.13%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
8.23%
6M
18.73%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROAM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ROAM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROAMEMXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.31

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

2.98

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.26

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.21

13.81

-0.60

ROAM vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and EMXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROAMEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.31

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.49

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and EMXC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ROAM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than EMXC's 2.60% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.98%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.60%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and EMXC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROAMEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-42.81%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-14.41%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-28.91%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-10.88%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-10.35%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.40%

-0.68%

Volatility

ROAM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is 7.59%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that ROAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROAMEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

11.89%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

16.14%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

20.58%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

16.70%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

19.51%

-1.68%