PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. PAPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than PAPI's 5.81% return.


RNTY

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.38%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAPI

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.28%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.78%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and PAPI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

0.61

The correlation between RNTY and PAPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNTYPAPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.81

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

4.90

-1.51

RNTY vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the PAPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and PAPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNTYPAPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.19

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.88

0.00

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum PAPI drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and PAPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYPAPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-14.27%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-6.86%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-5.06%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-2.73%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.53%

-0.17%

Volatility

RNTY vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 2.23%. This indicates that RNTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYPAPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.23%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

7.00%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.61%

10.55%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

11.76%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

11.76%

-1.01%

RNTY vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNTY vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than PAPI's 7.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.62%7.59%7.07%1.45%
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
13.30%8.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and PAPI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNTY has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to PAPI (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs PAPI's -14.27%.

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 12.39% vs 8.01% for RNTY. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.

RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 13.30%, compared with 7.62% for PAPI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 0.29% for PAPI.

PAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and PAPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer