RNTY vs. GSG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - RNTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. RNTY is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, RNTY returned 6.89% vs 51.06% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RNTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.

Performance

RNTY vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 41.50% return.

RNTY

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.32%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 6.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 41.50%
• 6M: 40.89%
• 1Y: 51.06%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 15.80%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	5.40%	4.10%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	41.50%	6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and GSG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

RNTY vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY

RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 20
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 72
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNTY	GSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.24	-1.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.86	-1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.40	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	5.72	-4.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	15.15	-12.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNTY vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNTY	GSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	2.24	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	-0.09	+0.90

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNTY	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-89.62%	+81.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-9.46%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-57.28%	+54.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-63.72%	+61.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	3.57%	-1.21%

Volatility

RNTY vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 2.75%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNTY	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	7.89%	-5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.83%	20.41%	-12.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.59%	23.01%	-12.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.74%	22.61%	-11.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.74%	22.03%	-11.29%

RNTY vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNTY vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.26%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	0.00%	0.00%
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	12.26%	8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNTY and GSG in my portfolio?

RNTY and GSG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNTY or GSG?

GSG has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to RNTY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs GSG's -89.62%.

Which ETF is better, RNTY or GSG?

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.06% vs 6.89% for RNTY. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNTY or GSG?

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.06% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNTY or GSG?

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNTY or GSG?

RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 12.26%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

What is the main difference between RNTY and GSG?

RNTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 0.75% for GSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.