RNSC vs. SCHA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RNSC (Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RNSC tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Small Cap US Equity Select Index while SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNSC returned 2.20%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RNSC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.

Performance

RNSC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNSC achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 16.69% return.

RNSC

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 6.79%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

SCHA

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 15.72%
• 1Y: 36.92%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNSC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNSC Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF	1.36%	2.41%	6.38%	15.98%	-13.17%	25.56%	10.26%	21.31%	-11.92%	10.39%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	16.69%	11.60%	11.16%	18.46%	-19.81%	16.45%	19.34%	26.50%	-11.79%	10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RNSC and SCHA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.85

The correlation between RNSC and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNSC vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNSC	SCHA
Healthcare	16.8%	13.5%
Financial Services	16.1%	15.7%
Industrials	15.8%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	9.0%
Technology	10.5%	23.3%
Real Estate	9.5%	6.0%
Communication Services	5.0%	2.4%
Basic Materials	4.6%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	2.6%
Energy	3.7%	5.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.3%

Return for Risk

RNSC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNSC

RNSC Risk / Return Rank: 15
RNSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RNSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RNSC Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RNSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RNSC Martin Ratio Rank: 16

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 67
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNSC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNSC	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	2.03	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.83	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.34	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	3.90	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	14.31	-12.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNSC vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNSC and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNSC	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34	2.03	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.30	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.57	-0.26

Drawdowns

RNSC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNSC drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNSC and SCHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNSC	SCHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.26%	-42.41%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.31%	-9.50%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.08%	-27.29%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.08%	-30.79%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.65%	-3.41%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-7.58%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	2.59%	+1.39%

Volatility

RNSC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) is 3.65%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that RNSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNSC	SCHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	5.92%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	13.26%	-2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	18.30%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	21.98%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.80%	22.73%	+0.07%

RNSC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNSC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNSC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

RNSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNSC Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.71%	2.29%	1.95%	1.35%	1.32%	1.77%	2.13%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNSC and SCHA in my portfolio?

RNSC and SCHA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNSC or SCHA?

SCHA has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to RNSC (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNSC dropped -43.26% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, RNSC or SCHA?

On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 6.57% vs 2.20% for RNSC. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RNSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNSC or SCHA?

Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNSC or SCHA?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RNSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNSC or SCHA?

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for RNSC.

What is the main difference between RNSC and SCHA?

RNSC tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Small Cap US Equity Select Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RNSC and 0.04% for SCHA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.