RNRG vs. URAN

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RNRG returned 27.31% vs 8.01% for URAN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

RNRG vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's -6.44% return.

RNRG

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -6.97%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 8.55%
• 1Y: 27.31%
• 3Y*: 1.81%
• 5Y*: -4.67%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

URAN

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -11.06%
• YTD: -6.44%
• 6M: -9.14%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	8.52%	29.61%	-16.03%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-6.44%	49.05%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and URAN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.34

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 60
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 12
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNRG	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	0.20	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	0.57	+1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.07	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	0.26	+2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	0.56	+9.63

RNRG vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-31.96%	-26.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-31.02%	+21.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.79%	-28.98%	-6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.49%	-11.28%	-13.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	14.29%	-11.60%

Volatility

RNRG vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 5.24%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	13.07%	-7.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	30.28%	-17.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.97%	39.67%	-23.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.16%	39.37%	-19.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	39.37%	-19.74%

RNRG vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than URAN's 2.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.39%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.74%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNRG and URAN in my portfolio?

RNRG and URAN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNRG or URAN?

URAN has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to RNRG (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNRG dropped -58.79% vs URAN's -31.96%.

Which ETF is better, RNRG or URAN?

On 1-year performance, RNRG leads with 27.31% vs 8.01% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNRG or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, RNRG has performed better with a 27.31% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or URAN?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RNRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or URAN?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.39% for RNRG.

What is the main difference between RNRG and URAN?

RNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while URAN is Uranium. RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.