RNRG vs. FAN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN).

RNRG and FAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RNRG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. It was launched on May 28, 2015. FAN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2008. Both RNRG and FAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RNRG vs. FAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RNRG vs. FAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	11.62%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	37.04%	-6.22%	21.16%
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	20.96%	40.38%	-8.96%	-3.20%	-13.12%	-11.63%	61.16%	31.22%	-11.40%	16.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than FAN's 20.96% return. Over the past 10 years, RNRG has underperformed FAN with an annualized return of 4.31%, while FAN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.

RNRG

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 15.26%
• 1Y: 47.91%
• 3Y*: 1.37%
• 5Y*: -3.90%
• 10Y*: 4.31%

FAN

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 20.96%
• 6M: 26.67%
• 1Y: 66.81%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. FAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FAN's 0.62% expense ratio.

RNRG

Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF

FAN

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. FAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 96
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FAN

FAN Risk / Return Rank: 97
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. FAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNRG	FAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	3.13	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.77	-0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.54	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	6.30	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.94	24.07	-1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNRG vs. FAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the FAN Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and FAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNRG	FAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	3.13	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.16	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.49	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.04	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and FAN is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RNRG vs. FAN - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than FAN's 1.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	1.03%	1.35%	1.52%	1.71%	1.50%	1.79%	0.84%	2.42%	2.67%	2.59%	6.04%	2.35%

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. FAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, smaller than the maximum FAN drawdown of -79.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and FAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	FAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-79.84%	+21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-10.66%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	-39.47%	-12.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	-46.29%	-12.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.95%	0.00%	-33.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-45.44%	+21.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	2.79%	-0.48%

Volatility

RNRG vs. FAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 6.29%, while First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	FAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	7.32%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	14.55%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.41%	21.43%	-3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.17%	21.26%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	20.98%	-1.36%