PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNPGX vs. ABALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNPGX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than ABALX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RNPGX has outperformed ABALX with an annualized return of 13.83%, while ABALX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.


RNPGX

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.11%
YTD
6.89%
6M
7.82%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
13.83%

ABALX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.87%
YTD
9.47%
6M
10.29%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
6.89%21.71%17.13%25.06%-25.70%18.00%33.88%31.22%-5.71%29.31%
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.47%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RNPGX and ABALX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.91

The correlation between RNPGX and ABALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNPGX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNPGX
RNPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RNPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RNPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNPGXABALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.53

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.49

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

15.74

-8.26

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the ABALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNPGX and ABALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNPGXABALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.81

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.90

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.95

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.81

-0.12

Drawdowns

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNPGX drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum ABALX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNPGX and ABALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNPGXABALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-40.20%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-7.03%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-10.68%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.25%

-18.76%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.25%

-22.34%

-11.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.46%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-3.85%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.55%

+1.15%

Volatility

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) at 2.71%. This indicates that RNPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNPGXABALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.71%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

6.82%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

8.73%

+4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

10.49%

+6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

10.67%

+7.16%

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNPGX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNPGX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison

RNPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than ABALX's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.58%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
6.43%6.87%5.45%5.67%4.53%7.31%4.41%4.47%7.95%5.80%4.20%6.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RNPGX and ABALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RNPGX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to ABALX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNPGX dropped -34.25% vs ABALX's -40.20%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNPGX and ABALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer