PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNMBY vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNMBY vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNMBY achieves a -26.62% return, which is significantly lower than T's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RNMBY has outperformed T with an annualized return of 37.86%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.


RNMBY

1D
-4.50%
1M
1.92%
YTD
-26.62%
6M
-26.10%
1Y
-35.22%
3Y*
68.65%
5Y*
68.41%
10Y*
37.86%

T

1D
-1.23%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-13.78%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNMBY vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-26.62%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%-2.03%28.14%-29.38%98.17%
T
AT&T Inc.
-4.15%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RNMBY and T is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012

0.12

The correlation between RNMBY and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RNMBY:

€3.56

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

RNMBY:

64.18

T:

7.65

PEG Ratio

RNMBY:

2.93

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

RNMBY:

4.83

T:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNMBY:

€9.58B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNMBY:

€4.12B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNMBY:

€1.81B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNMBY vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNMBY vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNMBYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.91

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.63

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-1.29

-0.43

RNMBY vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNMBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is comparable to the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNMBY and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNMBY vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNMBY drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBY and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNMBYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.75%

-64.15%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.06%

-21.87%

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.06%

-21.87%

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.06%

-32.01%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-42.35%

-25.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.69%

-19.13%

-23.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-15.72%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.54%

10.70%

+9.84%

Volatility

RNMBY vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.27%. This indicates that RNMBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNMBYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

8.27%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.12%

17.84%

+16.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.85%

22.21%

+23.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.85%

24.03%

+20.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.54%

23.74%

+17.80%

Dividends

RNMBY vs. T - Dividend Comparison

RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than T's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
1.02%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.77%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

RNMBY vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG ADR and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.97B
33.47B
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RNMBY values in EUR, T values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


RNMBY and T have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNMBY has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to T (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBY dropped -67.75% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNMBY and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer