RNIN vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNIN is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bushido, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. RNIN is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, RNIN returned 31.53% vs 1645.55% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RNIN charges 0.68%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

RNIN vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNIN achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 835.99% return.

RNIN

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 17.39%
• 6M: 17.62%
• 1Y: 31.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 8.73%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 835.99%
• 6M: 698.56%
• 1Y: 1,645.55%
• 3Y*: 126.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNIN vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	17.39%	10.27%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	835.99%	58.88%

Correlation

The correlation between RNIN and BWET is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

RNIN vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 73
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNIN vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNIN	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	16.94	-14.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	6.37	-3.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.93	-0.55
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	51.48	-46.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.46	137.13	-117.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNIN vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 16.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNIN and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNIN	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	16.94	-14.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.89	1.86	+0.03

Drawdowns

RNIN vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNIN drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNIN and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNIN	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-56.90%	+51.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-30.64%	+24.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-14.91%	+13.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-24.10%	+22.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	11.50%	-9.90%

Volatility

RNIN vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is 4.75%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.76%. This indicates that RNIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNIN	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	33.76%	-29.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	88.46%	-78.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	98.44%	-83.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	70.46%	-55.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	70.46%	-55.52%

RNIN vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNIN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNIN vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

RNIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.75%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNIN and BWET in my portfolio?

RNIN and BWET have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNIN or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.76%) compared to RNIN (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNIN dropped -5.70% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, RNIN or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1645.55% vs 31.53% for RNIN. On fees, RNIN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RNIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNIN or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1645.55% return vs 31.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNIN or BWET?

RNIN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNIN or BWET?

RNIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between RNIN and BWET?

RNIN is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Bushido and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RNIN and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.94 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.