RNEM vs. VEXC
RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RNEM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
RNEM vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.21% return.
RNEM
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNEM vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | -1.51% | 3.15% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNEM and VEXC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNEM vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
RNEM
VEXC
RNEM vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.21 | -1.99 |
Drawdowns
RNEM vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -12.42% | -25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -1.20% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -2.23% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | — | — |
Volatility
RNEM vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 18.89% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 18.89% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 18.89% | -1.67% |
RNEM vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNEM vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | 2.79% | 2.75% | 3.45% | 1.63% | 2.99% | 3.20% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 2.85% | 2.28% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNEM and VEXC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.
RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for RNEM and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer