PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNEM vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNEM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


RNEM

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNEM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
-1.51%15.58%-1.47%23.43%-8.75%6.16%-8.16%12.76%-9.34%11.97%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%33.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RNEM and DBO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017

0.17

The correlation between RNEM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNEM vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNEM
DBO

Financial Services

34.7%
116.0%

Basic Materials

13.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Communication Services

9.1%

-

Energy

7.6%

-

Technology

6.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Healthcare

4.6%

-

Industrials

4.1%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Financial Services

RNEM
34.7%
DBO
116.0%

Basic Materials

RNEM
13.7%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

RNEM
10.1%
DBO

-

Communication Services

RNEM
9.1%
DBO

-

Energy

RNEM
7.6%
DBO

-

Technology

RNEM
6.0%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

RNEM
5.9%
DBO

-

Healthcare

RNEM
4.6%
DBO

-

Industrials

RNEM
4.1%
DBO

-

Utilities

RNEM
3.7%
DBO

-

Real Estate

RNEM
0.8%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNEM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNEM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNEMDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.44

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

9.02

-8.22

RNEM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNEMDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.34

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.50

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.02

+0.21

Drawdowns

RNEM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNEMDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-90.18%

+51.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-18.19%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-28.20%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-37.68%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-51.38%

+43.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-62.25%

+52.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

8.92%

-4.33%

Volatility

RNEM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) is 4.23%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that RNEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNEMDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

12.61%

-8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

28.20%

-17.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

34.46%

-21.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

32.29%

-17.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

31.78%

-14.56%

RNEM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNEM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.79%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNEM and DBO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to RNEM (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 3.88% for RNEM. On fees, RNEM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNEM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

RNEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNEM and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer