RND vs. UNOV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RND (First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - RND tracks the Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index while UNOV tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RND returned 26.66% vs 13.88% for UNOV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RND charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.

Performance

RND vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RND achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.56% return.

RND

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 26.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNOV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 13.88%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RND vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	6.88%	22.38%	26.88%
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November	5.56%	9.92%	6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between RND and UNOV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	0.82

The correlation between RND and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

RND vs. UNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RND	UNOV
Technology	44.1%	36.2%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	10.1%
Communication Services	14.2%	10.9%
Healthcare	14.0%	8.4%
Industrials	8.5%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	4.9%
Financial Services	1.1%	11.9%
Basic Materials	0.9%	1.8%
Energy	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

RND vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RND

RND Risk / Return Rank: 44
RND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RND Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RND Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RND Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RND Martin Ratio Rank: 40

UNOV

UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 77
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RND vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RND	UNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.50	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	3.63	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.51	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.08	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	15.01	-8.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RND vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RND Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RND and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RND	UNOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	2.50	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.92	+0.39

Drawdowns

RND vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RND drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RND and UNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RND	UNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-13.84%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.56%	-4.52%	-11.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.07%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-1.66%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	0.93%	+3.36%

Volatility

RND vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.11%. This indicates that RND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RND	UNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	1.11%	+2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	4.67%	+7.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	5.58%	+10.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.13%	6.83%	+14.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.13%	7.72%	+13.41%

RND vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RND has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RND vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither RND nor UNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RND and UNOV in my portfolio?

RND and UNOV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RND or UNOV?

RND has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to UNOV (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RND dropped -23.52% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

Which ETF is better, RND or UNOV?

On 1-year performance, RND leads with 26.66% vs 13.88% for UNOV. On fees, RND is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RND or UNOV?

Over the 1-year period, RND has performed better with a 26.66% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RND or UNOV?

RND is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RND or UNOV?

RND and UNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RND and UNOV?

RND tracks Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index, while UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RND and 0.79% for UNOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.