PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMYYX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMYYX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than FYMIX's 8.03% return.


RMYYX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.19%
6M
3.22%
YTD
5.76%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.09%
ALL TIME*
5.60%

FYMIX

1D
1.91%
1M
-1.01%
6M
5.01%
YTD
8.03%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RMYYX
Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund
5.76%14.24%5.64%11.56%-13.70%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
8.03%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RMYYX and FYMIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.85

The correlation between RMYYX and FYMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMYYX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMYYX
RMYYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RMYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RMYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMYYXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.92

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

7.94

+0.26

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMYYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMYYX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMYYX drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FYMIX drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMYYX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMYYXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-22.70%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-8.80%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-12.72%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.92%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-5.49%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.13%

-0.59%

Volatility

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX) is 1.29%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that RMYYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMYYXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

3.40%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

10.16%

-5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

11.92%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.79%

12.79%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

12.79%

-4.23%

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMYYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMYYX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

RMYYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FYMIX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.41%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMYYX
Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund
3.81%4.10%5.57%5.20%4.02%5.89%1.52%3.60%3.83%3.42%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMYYX and FYMIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYMIX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to RMYYX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMYYX dropped -21.79% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

RMYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMYYX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer