PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMUNX vs. VAFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than VAFAX's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has underperformed VAFAX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while VAFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


RMUNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.17%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
3.76%

VAFAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.77%
YTD
8.97%
6M
7.79%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
1.78%0.82%2.37%9.85%-15.09%6.83%5.84%13.22%8.89%3.69%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
8.97%11.86%34.78%40.91%-31.20%11.13%42.15%36.55%-3.99%27.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RMUNX and VAFAX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2005

-0.04

The correlation between RMUNX and VAFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMUNX vs. VAFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMUNX
RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VAFAX
VAFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VAFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VAFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMUNXVAFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.17

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

3.52

+2.46

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMUNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the VAFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMUNX and VAFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMUNXVAFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.17

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.46

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.71

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.57

+0.47

Drawdowns

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum VAFAX drawdown of -48.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and VAFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMUNXVAFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-48.48%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-19.27%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.10%

-27.24%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-38.86%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.81%

-38.86%

+17.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.60%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-8.13%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

6.35%

-4.66%

Volatility

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) is 1.68%, while Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that RMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMUNXVAFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

5.02%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

14.64%

-11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

19.21%

-14.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

23.05%

-16.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

22.31%

-16.31%

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than VAFAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMUNX vs. VAFAX - Dividend Comparison

RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than VAFAX's 12.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
3.13%5.30%4.81%3.77%3.03%3.24%3.32%3.43%3.40%4.34%6.01%6.55%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
12.93%14.09%3.74%0.00%8.32%26.50%8.78%6.85%10.42%5.37%4.08%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMUNX and VAFAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAFAX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to RMUNX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMUNX dropped -36.55% vs VAFAX's -48.48%.

RMUNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMUNX and VAFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer