PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMUNX vs. VADAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than VADAX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has underperformed VADAX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while VADAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


RMUNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.17%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
3.76%

VADAX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.86%
YTD
9.47%
6M
9.89%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
1.78%0.82%2.37%9.85%-15.09%6.83%5.84%13.22%8.89%3.69%
VADAX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A
9.47%10.89%12.40%13.29%-12.07%28.93%12.30%28.59%-8.19%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between RMUNX and VADAX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1997

-0.05

The correlation between RMUNX and VADAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMUNX vs. VADAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMUNX
RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VADAX
VADAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VADAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VADAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VADAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VADAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VADAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMUNXVADAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.43

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

9.19

-3.20

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMUNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VADAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMUNX and VADAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMUNXVADAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.49

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.62

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.46

+0.58

Drawdowns

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum VADAX drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and VADAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMUNXVADAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-60.27%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-7.89%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.10%

-17.92%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-21.74%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.81%

-39.32%

+17.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.42%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-7.10%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.08%

-0.39%

Volatility

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) is 1.68%, while Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that RMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VADAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMUNXVADAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.61%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

8.38%

-5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

11.64%

-7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

16.27%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

18.53%

-12.53%

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VADAX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMUNX vs. VADAX - Dividend Comparison

RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than VADAX's 9.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
3.13%5.30%4.81%3.77%3.03%3.24%3.32%3.43%3.40%4.34%6.01%6.55%
VADAX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A
9.32%10.21%8.77%4.69%8.49%9.80%6.21%4.49%6.90%2.76%0.30%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMUNX and VADAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VADAX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to RMUNX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMUNX dropped -36.55% vs VADAX's -60.27%.

VADAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMUNX and VADAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer