RMUNX vs. FSMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX).
RMUNX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on May 14, 1986. FSMUX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 24, 2021.
Performance
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund | -1.80% | 0.82% | 2.37% | 9.85% | -15.09% | 1.81% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | -1.13% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than FSMUX's -1.13% return.
RMUNX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMUNX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
RMUNX
FSMUX
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMUNX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 0.63 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.28 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 0.78 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMUNX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.63 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | -0.00 | +1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMUNX and FSMUX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than FSMUX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund | 3.17% | 5.30% | 4.81% | 3.77% | 3.03% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.43% | 3.40% | 4.34% | 6.01% | 6.55% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.35% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, which is greater than FSMUX's maximum drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and FSMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMUNX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.55% | -16.27% | -20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -5.30% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -2.56% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -5.61% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 1.96% | +1.88% |
Volatility
RMUNX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 0.99%. This indicates that RMUNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMUNX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 0.99% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.12% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.49% | 6.65% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 4.67% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 4.67% | +1.30% |