RMTBX vs. ECAT
RMTBX (Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - RMTBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, RMTBX returned 4.10%/yr vs 19.58%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMTBX charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMTBX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 12.06% return.
RMTBX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ECAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMTBX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund | 0.12% | 7.25% | 0.54% | 7.76% | -11.67% | -0.41% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 12.06% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMTBX and ECAT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMTBX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
RMTBX
ECAT
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMTBX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.90 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 7.04 | -3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMTBX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, smaller than the maximum ECAT drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMTBX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMTBX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.19% | -32.23% | +15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -11.80% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.24% | -15.79% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.46% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -9.04% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.17% | -1.92% |
Volatility
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) is 1.07%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that RMTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMTBX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 4.36% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 10.99% | -8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 13.79% | -10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 16.89% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 16.89% | -12.14% |
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMTBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMTBX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
RMTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than ECAT's 21.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.78% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMTBX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund | 3.33% | 3.34% | 3.13% | 5.19% | 4.47% | 4.35% | 5.40% | 3.38% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMTBX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to RMTBX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMTBX dropped -17.19% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMTBX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer