RMRC vs. SAPH
RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SAPH.
Performance
RMRC vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RMRC
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SAPH
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- 19.22%
- 6M
- -15.81%
- YTD
- -19.27%
- 1Y
- -32.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $203.42K | $116.31K | $156.01K | |
| $30.61K | $28.06K | $22.54K |
RMRC vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 2.77% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMRC and SAPH is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMRC vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank
RMRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAPH
RMRC vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMRC | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMRC vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and SAPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMRC | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -51.72% | +45.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -39.47% | +38.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -23.11% | +21.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.05% | — |
Volatility
RMRC vs. SAPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMRC | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 37.36% | -27.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 35.48% | -25.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 35.48% | -25.31% |
RMRC vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMRC vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison
RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SAPH's 3.46% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 0.58% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMRC and SAPH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.
SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.19% for SAPH.
Find the right allocation for RMRC and SAPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer