RMNY vs. RGEF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMNY (Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF) and RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMNY is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Rockefeller, while RGEF is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Rockefeller. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RMNY returned 7.88% vs 31.08% for RGEF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

RMNY vs. RGEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMNY achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than RGEF's 13.96% return.

RMNY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGEF

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 6M: 14.81%
• 1Y: 31.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMNY vs. RGEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	2.39%	2.35%	-0.09%
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	13.96%	25.37%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RMNY and RGEF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.23

Return for Risk

RMNY vs. RGEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMNY

RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 66
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RGEF

RGEF Risk / Return Rank: 70
RGEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RGEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RGEF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RGEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RGEF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMNY vs. RGEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMNY	RGEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.27	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.17	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.40	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	3.14	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	14.03	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMNY vs. RGEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the RGEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMNY and RGEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMNY	RGEF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.27	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.45	-0.84

Drawdowns

RMNY vs. RGEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMNY drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum RGEF drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNY and RGEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMNY	RGEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-16.01%	+10.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.28%	-9.95%	+7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.42%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.79%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	2.22%	-1.53%

Volatility

RMNY vs. RGEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) is 1.30%, while Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that RMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMNY	RGEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	4.22%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	11.11%	-8.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	13.77%	-9.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.19%	16.80%	-11.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.19%	16.80%	-11.61%

RMNY vs. RGEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RMNY and RGEF have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

RMNY vs. RGEF - Dividend Comparison

RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than RGEF's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	0.88%	0.92%	0.29%
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	4.31%	4.10%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMNY and RGEF in my portfolio?

RMNY and RGEF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMNY or RGEF?

RGEF has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to RMNY (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMNY dropped -5.70% vs RGEF's -16.01%.

Which ETF is better, RMNY or RGEF?

On 1-year performance, RGEF leads with 31.08% vs 7.88% for RMNY. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, RMNY has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RMNY or RGEF?

Over the 1-year period, RGEF has performed better with a 31.08% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMNY or RGEF?

RMNY and RGEF have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMNY or RGEF?

RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 0.88% for RGEF.

What is the main difference between RMNY and RGEF?

RMNY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RGEF is Global Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.